IN MY OPINION - THE DEATH OF LUKUS GLENN - The public deserves more than silence

Special to The Oregonian, Lawrence K. Peterson


I represent the family of Lukus Glenn, the 18-year-old who was shot and killed last month by Washington County sheriff's deputies shortly after his mother called 9-1-1 for help in dealing with her drunk, distressed son.
Because of numerous public misrepresentations by Washington County officials, Lukus' parents, Hope and Brad Glenn, have sought to have a further conversation within the community about their son's death, a conversation between the public and law enforcement to help all of us understand the role of emergency services. Why? Because in Hope's words, "They didn't have to shoot him; we just asked for help."

Local citizens invest millions of dollars annually in law enforcement and 9-1-1 services. Local government is responsible to see that the money is well spent and that police power is not abused. City halls and county boards certainly should have a voice after such incidents and should provide a forum through which the public, the families of those affected and law enforcement can be heard.

But some in law enforcement don't see it that way. Former Portland police officer C.W. Jensen argued in a letter to the editor in The Oregonian that the lay public doesn't understand such incidents because they are not experts and have never faced violent confrontations. In an article in the October "Rap Sheet" from the Portland Police Association, retired Capt. James Harvey rails against "armchair quarterbacks" and mockingly suggests that people should call columnist Steve Duin or The Oregonian's offices "to deal with the violence," as if this bit of curious wit ends the discussion. In the same edition, PPA president and police officer Robert King rebukes any request for a public inquest as "outdated, unnecessary and destructive" because of the "community's failure to understand us."

The last time I checked, Steve Duin and The Oregonian are in business to report and comment on news and events, while law enforcement officials have sworn to protect and to serve. It is simply arrogant to state that those people you are sworn to protect and serve --and who are taxed for your paycheck --should not have the right to voice their concerns.

In the Glenn case, the family looked forward to a grand jury hearing. None was convened. They were told to wait for the official reports. They did. What they found was that the officers had inaccurately described the facts regarding Lukus' death --specifically that there was a long gap between when beanbag rounds were fired and when the lethal rounds were fired. The Washington County district attorney accepted the officers' version of the events, even though an audio recording of that night clearly contradicts that version, showing that there was no gap between the beanbag rounds and the lethal fire.

Despite pointing out the plain inaccuracy of the DA's report, the family's questions have been met with deafening silence from public officials.

It doesn't require a history of experience with violent confrontation to listen to a tape recording --or from that to question the actions of law enforcement. Asking legitimate questions is the public's right, and it is the government's obligation to answer.

Portland Police Chief Rosie Sizer got a lot of it right in her opinion piece last week ("A time to focus on the broader issues," Oct. 25). This is the time to "focus on the larger picture" in review of emergency services. It is not the time to fall behind the closed ranks of the "thin blue line" and hope the questions go away.

An open, transparent review of the facts surrounding Lukus Glenn's death is a constructive step in the process of administering emergency services and restoring the public's confidence in the 9-1-1 system. It's not the first time that a family of a troubled, drunken teen has called for help. And it won't be the last.

Lawrence K. Peterson is an attorney representing the Glenn family.